Call for Exo-Zodiacal Dust Survey Key Project Teams

NASA is soliciting proposals for Key Science teams to use the Keck Interferometer Nuller to study exo-zodiacal dust around main sequence stars. This call is being administered by the Michelson Science Center (MSC). These proposals will be evaluated by a specially-convened NASA Keck Time Allocation Committee which will make recommendations to the MSC Executive Director. We expect that a few teams will be selected in response to this call.

pdf version of this call

Instrument Overview

The KI Nuller (KIN) provides a unique observing capability specifically designed to detect faint material near a central star by nulling out the central region with an angular resolution of the fringe pattern of 25 milliarseconds (mas) within a field of view of approximately 600 mas (FWHM). The Nuller operates across the 8-13 micron spectral band (N band) with a spectral resolution of 40.

For a single calibrated measurement, the 1-sigma uncertainty in the flux with the interferometer at null is approximately 0.5% of the flux at peak when averaged over the spectral channels weighted by flux, which emphasizes the shorter wavelengths. Note that for an extended object, only 1/2 of the flux passes through the interferometer fringe pattern as compared to a compact object. The validation tests completed to date indicate good repeatability of the null leakage performance at the 0.5% uncertainty level for single target/calibrator pairs during a 3 hr block on targets with an N band flux of 2 to 3 Jy. The compilation of the validation tests completed to date indicate a bias of approximately -0.5% in the final calibrated leakage. It is most likely that this bias is attributable to intensity differences between the target and its calibrators in the tests to date. A specific experiment performed in August supports that this bias is tied to the flux level, but the underlying origin of the bias is not yet understood. Achieving sqrt(N) improvements in accuracy with repeated 3-hour blocks will require addressing this bias through either modeling or experiment design.

For a G2V star the sensitivity in a 3-hour block corresponds to a limit of Ldust/Lstar = 3x10-5 (3 sigma) or roughly 300 times the level of emission of our solar system's zodiacal cloud. We expect that the quoted KIN uncertainty can be improved as the square root of the number of observing blocks.

The fringe tracking limit of the Nuller is 2.0 Jy in the N band, which sets a floor to the faintest stars that can be studied with KIN. Unlike the photometric or spectroscopic methods applied most recently using the Spitzer Space Telescope, measurements using the KIN remove the photospheric signal spatially and thus do not rely on precise absolute photometry or depend on the spectrum of the excess being different from that of the central star. Details of the observing parameters and sensitivities are available at http://msc.caltech.edu/software/KISupport/nulling/index.html.

Science Goals

The proposals should address two fundamental questions:
  1. What are the physical and evolutionary properties of exo-zodiacal disks, with a particular focus on studying warm (~300 K) material located in regions analogous to the zodiacal dust and asteroid belt of our solar system? Is material found within 1 AU by KIN a continuation of material seen at longer wavelengths by Spitzer? Are there excesses from hot material not previously identified in Spitzer surveys due to limitations on absolute photometric accuracy, and whose presence is hinted at by shorter-wavelength interferometric observations (e.g. Vega; Ciardi et al 2001; Absil et al, 2006)? Can spectroscopic information in the KIN band reveal mineralogical species not detectable in lower-spatial resolution observations? Does the presence of one or more planets affect the incidence or physical properties of the exo-zodiacal emission?
  2. What is the level of warm (~300 K) material in the exo-zodiacal disks around specific nearby main sequence stars which will be the prime targets for future planet finding missions such as TPF and Darwin. Studies at Spitzer sensitivity levels reveal that approximately 1% of main sequence stars show an excess at ~10 microns. How does this number increase with improved sensitivity? Is there a population of very small, hot dust grains (>500 K) that might have been missed by Spitzer's photometric or spectroscopic observations?

Observing Scenario and Available Time

During the 2008A and B semesters (Feb 2008 - Jan 2009) NASA is allocating the majority of its Keck observing time to this project. The proposed total Key Science allocation (for all teams) is 16 interferometer nights per semester. Proposals should assume a 1-year duration for the Key Science and describe a program which can be completed within that time frame, although an extension to future years with a lower number of nights may be possible for follow-up of interesting sources. All observations will be made in roughly 3-hour blocks. The observing time will be grouped into runs of 3-4 nights with 4 runs spread throughout the observing semester. Accounting for instrument setup overheads and weather losses, we expect to make ~40 of these block measurements in the 2008 observing year. Each observing block will typically include 3 calibrated scans with the performance described above.

To maximize observing efficiency and to ensure uniformity of the final dataset for future archival use, all observations in this program will be queue-scheduled in these roughly 3-hour blocks and be carried out in a service observing mode to be conducted by the MSC and Keck Observatory.

After the team(s) are selected, they will be asked to produce a prioritized list of targets in both science categories, i.e. disk science and TPF target survey. In the case of overlapping targets between multiple teams, objects will be assigned to only one team on the basis of the ranked lists. i.e. the team proposing the higher ranking for a particular source will be given the observations for that source. For each observing run, the MSC will request a prioritized list of targets (after the assignments above) for each team. The observing will be scheduled by the MSC in 3-hour blocks using these priorities while also striving to maximize the use of telescope time. In the case of multiple teams, the observing time allocated to each team will be divided in accord with TAC recommendations as averaged over a few runs. The list of successfully completed observations will be made available to all selected teams.

Data processing and Proprietary Period

All data will be processed through a standard pipeline by the MSC. The MSC will provide instrument-calibrated null leakages (Level 1) and sky-calibrated null leakages (Level 2) for all objects, as well as the Level 2 processing program. The MSC will also provide support in calibrating these observations. The data proprietary period will be 18 months from the day the data are taken. Each team will have access to data from its own targets and to all calibrator data. The MSC will also provide a visibility modeling tool which will include the basic properties of the nuller transmission pattern and the relevant KI parameters.

Evaluation Criteria

The proposals will be evaluated on the following criteria:
  1. Demonstrated understanding of the scientific context and theoretical background of the two science goals of the program:
    1. Improved scientific understanding of the debris disk phenomenon possible using the improved sensitivity and angular/spectral resolution of the KIN instrument.
    2. Characterizing exo-zodiacal emission in the context of the long term NASA goals for the detection and characterization of potentially habitable planets around solar-type stars.
  2. Detailed plan for source selection and observing time allocation within the bounds specified above (1 year, observing block allocations from 15 to 45 blocks). Note that there are no reserved objects for this call.
  3. Plan for data modeling and interpretation to include such topics as:
    1. Incorporating the interferometer response function in the measured excess.
    2. How measured excess relates to spatial structure and composition of the emitting material.
    3. How the statistics of detections and upper limits of the KIN survey relate to evolution of zodiacal clouds.
    4. How the statistics of the survey relate to NASA goals for planet detection.

Proposal Specifications

The proposal should contain the following sections and be formatted with 12-point font and 1-inch margins:
  1. Title page (1 page): Proposal title, PI (one only) and co-I names and affiliations, contact author identified with address, email, and fax.
  2. Scientific justification (5 pages, text only): Should include how the team will address the specified science goals.
  3. Source selection and interpretation plan (2 pages, including tables): Should include plan for source selection in queue observing mode
  4. References and figures (2 pages).
  5. No budget information is requested at this time.
The total proposal length must not exceed 10 pages. All proposals should be submitted online at http://msc.caltech.edu/missions/KeckSolicitation/ by no later than 5 pm PDT on September 24, 2007. The opportunity to propose as a Principal Investigator for NASA time on the Keck Telescopes is open to all U.S.-based astronomers having their principal affiliation at a U.S. institution. Contingent on available resources, limited funding may be available for data reduction and analysis through the Keck PI data award program.

Additional Information

Nuller instrument references TPF source list data base Example Spitzer exo-zodiacal surveys:
  • Chen et al, 2006, ApJS, 166, 351
  • Beichman et al, 2006, ApJ, 639, 1166
  • Bryden et al, 2006, ApJ, 636, 1098

If you have questions not addressed in this material, contact R. Akeson at rla@ipac.caltech.edu. A list of all questions and answers is available here.

Last updated Sept 11, 2007